Law – Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel

The Class Action Certification Process

Successful lawyer Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel graduated with a JD from Yale Law School and is a partner at Kaliel PLLC in Washington. Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel has been also appointed lead Class Counsel in multiple class actions, at the state and national level, where has he won contested class certification motions.

A class action lawsuit is employed in situations where class members (an aggregation of plaintiffs) sue a defendant for common damage. For instance, a group of consumers may file a class action lawsuit against a manufacturer for products that have resulted in negative impacts. In most situations, the individual value of damages is less significant, and filing separate lawsuits would be expensive and pointless.

For a class action lawsuit to proceed, certification of the class is necessary. Requirements may vary among states. Through class action certification, the court ensures plaintiffs have legal complaints similar enough to justify one uniform larger case against the named defendant. With class action certification, the court declares a class action is the best option to address the multiple claims. However, this does not mean that the jury finds the defendant liable.

Understanding the Super Lawyers Nomination Process

Accomplished class action litigator Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel obtained his JD from Yale Law School in New Haven, Connecticut. Super Lawyers recognized Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel as a Washington DC Rising Star in 2015.

Every year, the top lawyers practicing in Washington DC are recognized by Super Lawyers. Lawyers are included in the candidate pool if a peer formally nominates them or if they are identified during the research process.

Attorneys in each state are invited by Super Lawyers to nominate outstanding lawyers they have personally observed in action. Although they can nominate attorneys in their own firm, the number of in-firm nominations must not exceed those from outside their firm. Lawyers also cannot nominate themselves or attorneys practicing in another state.

Super Lawyers employs procedures that prevent lawyers from manipulating the system, such as firms casting identical nominations, or lawyers nominating each other. Each nomination carries a point value for the nominees, and nominations from an out-firm source attract more points compared to the in-firm nomination.

Super Lawyers also accepts informal suggestions from attorneys, clients, readers, and marketing directors who are not eligible to formally nominate. These earn no points but enable the inclusion of some overlooked lawyers to the candidate pools.

The number of nominations a lawyer receives does not determine if they make it to the final list. Instead, this decision is a result of research and evaluation.

A Look at Current Kaliel PLLC Investigations

Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel, a former staff sergeant with the United States Army, has worked as an attorney since graduating from Yale Law School in 2005. An expert in consumer class action lawsuits and cases concerning the financial services sector, Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel serves as a partner at Kaliel PLLC in Washington, D.C.

Since its founding in 2017, Kaliel PLLC has leveraged decades of combined attorney experience to secure hundreds of millions of dollars in legal verdicts for clients. In addition to representing plaintiffs in cases concerning financial services fraud, consumer protection, and false advertising, the firm seeks out potential class action cases through ongoing investigative work.

Kaliel PLLC investigates cases that range from fraud on the Zelle mobile finance application to Westin Hotels’ failure to refund sales tax on non-refundable hotel rooms. Other ongoing investigations cover areas such as rental car insurance, One Medical deceptive practices, and even Dulcolax Pink and Dulcolax for Women for charging women more for products that contain identical ingredients as gender-neutral items sold under the Dulcolax brand.

Yale Veterans Clinic Get Settlement in Veterans’ Class Action Suit

Before his career in law, Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel was an Army veteran, having served in the Second Iraq War (Second Persian Gulf War). After serving in the military, Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel, a Washington, D.C.-based class-action attorney, attended Yale Law School.

In November the Yale Law School Veterans Clinic announced that it reached a settlement agreement with the Army regarding service members who received a less-than-honorable discharge from the military, culminating in them losing some of their benefits. The Veterans Clinic at the Yale Law School is where students and faculty represent veterans involved in cases against administrative agencies and courts, and Kennedy v. McCarthy is one of the cases with which the clinic was involved.

Kennedy v. McCarthy is a class-action involving military members who suffered from undiagnosed behavioral conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), military sexual trauma (MST), and traumatic brain injury (TBI), and received a less-than-honorable discharge from the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB). Since the September 11 attacks, roughly 150,000 have been discharged from this branch of service under the same status, usually for misconduct attributable to one of the above conditions.

Even with directives from the Department of Defense that stipulated that the ADRB give liberal license to applications of members with PTSD or related conditions, the office gave veterans the less-than-honorable discharge, which prevented them from receiving full benefits. The settlement holds the Army responsible for making sure that veterans who served in Afghanistan and Iraq receive the chance to have their cases reviewed and discharge designation upgraded.

The settlement also provides for making sure that veterans who apply for upgrades benefit from future reforms. These reforms might include having access to medical evaluations and legal resources. Finally, ADRB is required to give each applicant a telephonic (by telephone) hearing.

How to Choose a Class Action Lawyer

An army veteran of the second Iraq War, Jeffrey Douglas Kalie completed his JD from Yale Law School. Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel is a partner at Kaliel PLLC and has worked on numerous consumer class action lawsuits as a litigator.

A class-action lawsuit enables a group of people with a similar claim against a corporation to sue at an equal time. Individuals pursue justice through a class action lawsuit when a defective consumer product causes them injury. In this case, the aim should be to locate the firm with the kind of attributes favorable for achieving the class’s best outcome.

An essential part of selecting a class action attorney is considering the lawyer’s compatibility level with the client. A potential class-action lawyer must fulfill the complainant’s need while simultaneously attending to the class’s demands. A class action lawyer must cooperate with the complainant, answer their questions in a way they comprehend, and be satisfactorily accessible. Overall, a good working relationship is a must for the entire procedure.

A vital aspect of the lawyer-client relationship is money. A plaintiff must select an attorney who is transparent with their charges. Generally, class action lawyers operate on a contingency fee basis in which the attorney forfeits payment for their service if the class action fails. Nevertheless, the client would have to pay for other expenses involved. Ultimately ensure the agreement is explicit and on paper before proceeding with a lawsuit.

Another critical aspect of choosing a class action lawyer is observing if a possible class action attorney possesses the capacity to fulfill the plaintiff’s demands from the plaintiff’s location. More so, the firm must have the expertise to address nationwide cases.

Difficulties in Building a Class for a Class Action Suit

Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel is an attorney and partner at Kaliel, PLLC in Washington. A graduate of Yale Law School, Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel has built a career centered around class action litigation and has worked as lead counsel in numerous nationwide lawsuits, resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars of restitution for class members.

To successfully litigate a class-action lawsuit, it is important to enroll the right number and type of clients into the class. Engaging with the right people in this process can be challenging. Reaching specific people harmed by a nationwide practice while excluding those who don’t specifically qualify takes creativity and resourcefulness.

Another challenge is convincing people of the class that it is in their best interest to participate in the class action. Some people distrust the entire process of class actions and have been led to believe it benefits litigators more than the affected class. Combating this perception is yet another hurdle in finding class action plaintiffs who are willing to take part in the proceedings.

What You Should Know About Class Action Lawsuits

A class action litigator in Washington, DC, Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel serves as a partner at Kaliel, PLLC. At his firm, Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel focuses on handling consumer class action suits, and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for his clients.

Class action lawsuits make for great news stories and are frequently in headlines, yet many people don’t actually understand such lawsuits and what they can mean. Here are a few must-know facts about class action suits:

There’s strength in numbers.
While there isn’t a set number of plaintiffs that class action lawsuits must have, larger numbers do have more power. Courts prefer moving class action cases with hundreds of plaintiffs through the legal system more efficiently, and these cases have a higher chance of ending positively for the plaintiffs.

The payout is sometimes small.
There are many class action cases where large corporations have settled for millions or hundreds of millions of dollars, but that doesn’t mean plaintiffs will all get huge payouts for their issues. Rather, the individual payout amount depends on the number of plaintiffs involved in the lawsuit.

Plaintiffs lose some of their rights.
Joining a class action lawsuit can be attractive for people, since it splits legal costs and can increase their chances of success. By joining such a suit, however,, plaintiffs forfeit their rights to pursue legal action individually. For many, this isn’t important, but some individuals may be capable of obtaining a more meaningful court victory if they file suits alone.

What is a Boutique Law Firm?

Attorney Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel of Washington, D.C. is widely recognized for his work in defending plaintiffs involved in class action lawsuits related to predatory banking practices. In 2018, Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel opened a boutique law practice with his partner, which focuses solely on litigation related to predatory lending practices.

In recent years, the rise of boutique law firms has been in response to lawyers deciding to focus on one legal specialization. While boutique law firms are typically smaller than the average large firm, they also are characterized by other factors.

Attorneys who belong to a boutique firm are experienced lawyers specializing in one area. These small firms are sometimes patched into a network of other boutique firms that an attorney can draw on for client referrals.

While retaining a lawyer is still expensive, boutique firms can offer their clients competitive fees. Boutique firms tend to outsource business tasks, which reduces overall costs. Outsourcing allows attorneys to focus on working on and winning their cases.

Earnin – Business Strategy or Deception

As a partner at Kaliel, PLLC and a class action litigator, Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel is an advocate for consumers who have suffered against predatory practices in the financial industry, more specifically banking. In addition to successfully winning lawsuits against Bank of America, Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel has also assisted consumers with recoveries in suits related to other predatory banking practices.

As banking becomes more flexible and versatile, financial institutions have introduced new, innovative products. For example, Earnin is the newest app that allows consumers to borrow against their paycheck. Earnin works by allowing consumers to advance a portion of their paycheck after they have worked a certain number of hours.

This idea seems to be much better than the traditional payday loans because consumers are not charged with high-interest rates. However, there are a few issues at play with this particular payday lending platform. For one, the company collects its money when the borrower is paid through their normal paycheck. But if the money is not available, borrowers incur overdraft fees. According to the lawsuit Stark v. Active Hours, the service causes customers to incur overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees.

The New York Department of Financial Services and other state organizations are beginning to look at Earnin’s overall business practices. Most lenders earn income on the money lent to borrowers through interest. Earnin does not charge its customers fees or interest but instead charges them a tip, which is usually 10 percent of the cash they borrow. The point of contention is the language used to convince consumers why the app is better than traditional payday loan services. Instead of calling the transaction a loan, the company refers to them as activations.

Because Earnin is exempt from the 2017 federal payday rule and the 1968 Truth in Lending Act, it has managed to go around traditional payday laws. When looking at how much tips eventual cost in interest, many believe the company to be another payday lender, though.

What Is a Class-Action Lawsuit?

Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel is a prominent class-action litigator in Washington, D.C. As a partner at Kaliel, PLLC, Jeffrey Douglas Kaliel specializes in representing plaintiffs in class-action lawsuits and personal injury cases.

A class-action lawsuit is submitted by a group of individuals against an organization or another individual. Class actions are reserved for cases in which the plaintiffs allegedly suffered the same or similar injuries from the defendant.

Also, class-action lawsuits are used when each plaintiff’s claim is too small to make a standard lawsuit worthwhile. Class actions are also more convenient for the courts than a large number of small, individual cases.

Most often, class-action lawsuits are filed against a local, state, or the federal government, manufacturers, employers, and banks and other financial institutions. The most common reasons for class-action suits include discrimination, false advertising, unlawful employment practices, and defective or failed products.

At the beginning, the judge has to certify the class and the lead plaintiff has to prove that the class has a valid claim. The main plaintiff also has to prove that the legal representation provided is fit to lead and represent the entire class.